by admin
| Motion # / Description | Planning Commission Recommendation | Neighborhood Stakeholders Recommendation |
| Motion 1: Uncontested portions of CWACNP | Approved | |
| Motion 2: Uncontested rezoning recommendations | Approved | |
| Motion 3: Contested land use recommendation L.6.2 related to Austin State School | NP SC Recommendation: “…Redevelopment should result in harmonious residential development near the existing residential areas and concentrate the more intensive mixed use development toward the northeast corner of the tract at MoPac and 35th Street….” | Desired Revision to NP SC Recommendation: “…Redevelopment should result in harmonious single family residential development near the existing residential areas and concentrate the more intensive mixed use development toward the northeast corner of the tract at MoPac and 35th Street….” Note over 800 petitions against multifamily. |
| Motion 4: Contested land use objective 7, recommendation 7.1 and FLUM related to Brackenridge Tract | Recommends Neighborhood Stakeholder’s proposed land use chapter provisions for Brackenridge Tract (Objectives 7-8 with recommendations) modeled after land use chapter provisions for Austin State School Tract. | Neighborhood Stakeholders proposed land use chapter provisions for Brackenridge Tract (Objectives 7-8 with recommendations) based on strong desire to provide planning guidance for Brackenridge Tract because these tracts were expressly included in our planning area by City Council, and because development of these tracts will most directly impact our planning area. See Brackenridge FLUM Motion 23 below. |
| Motion 5: Contested bicycle lanes in Windsor Road Planning Area | Staff Recommendation | Mixed support |
| Motion 6: Contested Windsor Road FLUM designation (1014 W. 31st Street) | Staff Recommendation (MF) | SF — There is NO property owner recommendation. |
| Motion 7: Contested WANG FLUM designation (2727 Exposition Boulevard – Casis Shopping Center) | Staff and Neighborhood Recommendation (NC) | NC |
| Motion 8: Contested WANG FLUM designation (2600/2601 and 2531/2527 Exposition – Tarrytown United Methodist and Sanctuary Churches) | Staff and Neighborhood Recommendation (SF) | SF |
| Motion 9: Contested WANG FLUM designation (1505 Forest Trail) | Neighborhood Recommendation (SF) | SF |
| Motion 10: Contested WANG FLUM designation (2506/2508/2510 Quarry Road) | Staff Recommendation (MF) | SF — There is NO property owner recommendation. |
| Motion 11: Contested WANG FLUM designation (1206 Norwalk Lane; 2508 & 2514 W. 12th Street; 2507/2509/2511 Quarry Road) | Staff Recommendation (MF) | SF — There is NO property owner recommendation. |
| Motion 12: Contested Special Use Infill Options (Small Lot Amnesty) | Staff and Neighborhood Recommendation (Area Wide) | Agreed |
| Motion 13: Contested Neighborhood Plan Design Tools (Garage Placement) | NP SC Recommendation (Apply in Windsor Road, not in WANG) | Mixed support |
| Motion 14: Contested Neighborhood Plan Design Tools (Impervious Cover & Parking Placement Restrictions) | Staff Recommendation (Area Wide) | Mixed support |
| Motion 15: Contested Windsor Road FLUM and zoning designation (1717/1721/1801/1803/1805 W. 35st Street) | NP SC Recommendation (Maintain current land use (NC) and zoning (LO-NP)) – NOTE VALID PETITION | NC and LO-NP |
| Motion 16: Contested Windsor Road zoning designation (3402 Kerbey Lane) | NP SC Recommendation (NO-NP) | SF-3-NP or NO-NP |
| Motion 17: Contested WANG FLUM and zoning designation (3215 Exposition Blvd – Elm Terrace) | No Recommendation | SF and SF-3-NP |
| Motion 18: Contested WANG zoning designation (700 Hearn St.) | MF-3-CO-NP with 35 ft height limit – NOTE VALID PETITION UNDERWAY. | MF-3-CO-NP with 35 ft height limit — There is NO property owner recommendation. |
| Motion 19: Contested WANG zoning designation (2309 Pruett Street) (Tract 105) | NP SC Recommendation (MF-2-CO-NP with limit to 4 units) | SF-6-NP – NOTE VALID PETITION UNDERWAY. |
| Motion 20: Contested WANG zoning designation (2310 W. 7th Street) (Tract 106) | Staff, Neighborhood, and NP SC Recommendation (SF-3-NP) – NOTE VALID PETITION UNDERWAY. | SF-3-NP |
| Motion 21: Contested WANG zoning designation (1504 Robin Hood Trail) (Tract 111) | NP SC Recommendation (NO-NP) | NO-NP and NO-MU-MP |
| Motion 22: Contested WANG zoning designation (1500 Scenic Drive) (Tract 113) | MF-4-NP with action to initiate CR rezoning separate from NP process | MF-4-NP |
| Motion 23?: Contested WANG FLUM designation (Brackenridge Tract) | Status unclear. | FLUM Based On Brackenridge Development Agreement. At PC Subcommittee, a FLUM following the terms of the Brackenridge Tract Development Agreement was submitted and discussed. Neighbors understood that the PC Subcommittee had adopted both the submitted Plan text as well as the proposed FLUM for the tract. We endorse the PC Recommendation in regard to the Plan text but ask that the proposed FLUM following the Brackenridge Tract Development Agreement be adopted as well |
| Motion 24?: Contested WANG FLUM/zoning designation (2425 Exposition) (Tarrytown Shopping Center) | Maintain current land use and zoning. |
“Sips & Songs for the Center” Featuring Monte Warden & the Wagoneers Friday, August 9, 2019 Doors open at 7:00 PM Music 8:00-10:00 PM The High Road Lodge, 700 Dawson Rd., Austin Join us for fun evening of live music benefitting The Friends of Austin State Supported Living Center. Cash bar – Silent Auction […]
You’re invited! Redbud Trail Bridge Project Open House Please join us for an informal open house on the Redbud Trail Bridge Replacement Project. Thursday, June 27, 2019 6 p.m. – 7:30 p.m. West Austin Youth Association (WAYA) 1314 Exposition Blvd. The purpose of this meeting is to provide you with an update on project activities and […]
Travis County is conducting a survey for how to proceed in the sale or lease of its Palm School site. In various resolutions and planning documents over the past several years, the City of Austin has consistently expressed interest in coordinating with Travis County to preserve Palm School as a public space, particularly because of […]